Grove & Associates Michigan injury and no-fault law
Menu
Provider claims review Call 313.733.1204

Aging-report triage: which no-fault balances to work first

Sort open PIP balances by date of service, not billing date, and work the ones nearest the one-year line first. This page gives you a quick date check, a five-bucket sort and a monthly routine.

Unpaid PIP balances at your practice? Request a provider claims review or call 313.733.1204.

On this page
  1. Check one date of service
  2. The five buckets
  3. Then sort by denial reason
  4. A worked example (hypothetical)
  5. A monthly routine
  6. What to send for a free review
  7. Questions people ask us

The short answer: a charge generally can’t be recovered for any part of a loss incurred more than a year before suit is filed, unless a pending claim paused the clock (MCL 500.3145). So the order of work is set by the date of service and by whether each bill is still pending, not by the size of the balance. The rule itself is explained in the one-year-back rule for providers.

Check one date of service

A planning aid, not a deadline calculation. It shows the raw one-year line and does not work out how long a pending claim paused the clock; that depends on the dates and records in each file. Nothing you enter leaves this page.

The five buckets

BucketWhich chargesWhat to do this month
UrgentWithin about 60 days of the one-year line and not clearly pausedInto the next suit filing, or get them reviewed now
Work this monthTwo to five months from the lineFix documentation gaps; decide on a demand or suit
Check the pauseBilled with records and never formally deniedPull proof of what the insurer received and when; follow up in writing
RoutineMore than five months from the lineBill with complete records; follow up 30 days after the insurer receives reasonable proof
Past the lineOver a year old with no pause you can showDon’t write off without a review of the submission and denial dates

Then sort by denial reason

Inside each bucket, group charges by the reason the insurer gave. Each reason needs different records, and some are cheaper to fix than to sue on.

A worked example (hypothetical)

Invented for illustration; not a client matter. A therapy clinic runs its aging on November 12 and finds 40 open charges against one insurer. Six have dates of service from early January, so their raw one-year line is about seven weeks out: urgent. Eleven were billed with records last spring and never formally denied: the clinic pulls its portal receipts to show when each arrived. Fourteen were cut to a lower fee-schedule amount: grouped for one recalculation demand. The rest are under five months old and go into routine follow-up.

A monthly routine

  1. Run the aging by date of service, by insurer.
  2. Update the status of every charge: billed, pending, formally denied (with the denial date).
  3. Move charges between buckets; anything newly urgent goes to review that week.
  4. Keep proof of delivery for every bill and record set: portal receipt, fax confirmation or clearinghouse acknowledgment.

What to send for a free review

Totals are enough to start. Please don’t send patient names or records through the website.

  • Open balances by insurer and by age of date of service
  • How many charges are billed but not formally denied
  • Recent denial letters, by reason (no patient details yet)
  • Who at the practice can sign a business associate agreement

Questions people ask us

Does billing the insurer stop the one-year clock?

It can pause it. MCL 500.3145 pauses the one-year period from the time a specific claim is made to the insurer until the insurer formally denies it, and the claim has to be pursued with reasonable diligence. A routine bill without the records the insurer needs, or one you cannot prove was received, is a weak basis for relying on a pause.

Should we sort the aging by billing date or date of service?

Date of service. The one-year-back rule looks at when the loss was incurred, not when you billed it.

Do we have to send patient data to get a review?

No. Totals by insurer and age are enough to start. Claim-level data comes later, through a secure transfer and after a business associate agreement is signed.

Request a provider claims review

To start, we need your name, your practice and a phone number; a rough unpaid balance helps if you have it. Patient-level data comes later, through a secure transfer we set up with you, so please leave patient details out of this form.

Prefer to talk now? Call 313.733.1204.

Justin Grove, Michigan attorney since 2007 (P71253). One office: Woodward Avenue, Bloomfield Hills.

  1. Send totals. Your practice, a contact and a rough balance. No patient information.
  2. We set up a secure transfer. You can ask about a business associate agreement before sending claim data.
  3. You get a written summary by insurer. Which balances look collectable and which deadlines are closest. Then you decide.

Paid $64 a test. Settled at $2,500 or more Per-test amounts across one provider’s claims; what is owed depends on the service, codes and fee schedule.

The claims review is free from $3,000 in total open balances.

Example: 313-555-0147

Reviews start at $3,000 in total open balances. A rough total is enough.

Add a note (optional) anything we should know

Totals only, please: no patient names, dates of birth or records. We arrange a secure transfer for claim data after the first call.

Sending this request does not make you a client of the firm. If a deadline is close, call.

Call 313.733.1204Provider claims review